Skip to content
GridNinja

Assessment review package

A concise brief, with a traceable supporting record.

A proof pack should make the reasoning inspectable. The public package is synthetic: it explains the record format and decision boundary without claiming a customer outcome or operational validation.

Start with the one-page decision brief

See the requested increment, modeled revision, governing conditions, and unresolved business question together. The HTML, PDF, and technical export identify the same fixture and publication version.

Open the sample decision brief →

What belongs in the package

A contracted package is scoped to the decision and available evidence. The sample illustrates these review objects.

01

Decision contract and profile

The facility boundary, historical interval, reference load, decision owner, requested profile, and any distinct revision.

02

Constraints and evidence gaps

Binding conditions, assumptions, input provenance, known limitations, and reasons a conclusion may be unavailable.

03

Model record

The modeled quantities and screening outcome with dataset, model, and schema versions. Economics remain unestimated unless separately scoped.

04

Review and authority boundary

What the reviewer is being asked to decide; what has not been assessed; and a clear distinction between report acceptance and operating permission.

Stable versions support a defensible review

A published version binds the snapshot, narrative, HTML brief, PDF, and export. Corrections create a new version. Withdrawn or unavailable artifacts must not silently resolve to another result.

Browse public evidence →

Proof before autonomy

Start with one capacity question.

Agree the decision, evidence boundary, responsibilities, and paid scope before work begins.