Public evidence policy
Publication gatedGridNinja public claims should never outrun their evidence. Every quantitative, comparative, capability, or outcome claim is scoped to an environment, measurement window, sample, baseline, maturity, evidence URL, owner, caveat, approved surface, and review expiry. Synthetic and illustrative values stay visibly labeled, while expired or retracted claims are removed from eligible copy and retained in correction history.
Inspect resourceComparison governance
Publication gatedGridNinja comparisons must describe what reviewed public materials establish, not what a competitor supposedly cannot do. Each comparison names the category, capability, source, retrieval date, scope, and limitation. Sources receive quarterly review, and crawlable citations remain available outside interactive drawers. Comparisons are corrected when products, documentation, or evidence change rather than being preserved for marketing convenience.
Inspect resourceTrust policy
Publication gatedGridNinja retains a permanent record when a substantive public claim is corrected, expires, or is retracted. The record identifies the affected wording and URL, prior state, reason, date, evidence change, owner, and replacement language when applicable. Corrections do not silently erase prior claims, and retracted values are removed from snippets, structured data, and active promotional surfaces.
Inspect resourceCapacity Audit method
Publication gatedA GridNinja Capacity Audit maps claimed and modeled headroom to the evidence required for safe, usable, auditable capacity. It examines workload demand, topology, cooling, storage, bridge power, reserves, operating policy, telemetry quality, recovery, and SLA constraints. The deliverable separates accepted opportunities, repairable gaps, rejected assumptions, and no-proof conditions without promising a predetermined MW result.
Inspect resource