Skip to content
GridNinja

For colocation and REIT operators

Review the evidence before the next tenant commitment.

Scope a capacity decision assessment for one proposed tenant increment. Compare the request with declared facility conditions and make unresolved SLA, reserve, and commercial questions explicit.

A modeled increment is not yet sellable capacity

Tenant commitments, reserve policy, cooling conditions, and operating authority need their own review. Safe oversubscription and safe sellable MW are objectives requiring site evidence; the sample does not demonstrate either.

Bring the decision owners together

Agree the facility boundary and the commitment under consideration before analysis.

01

Commercial decision owner

State the proposed increment, timing, service obligation, and minimum useful profile. Decide whether any modeled revision meets the actual tenant need.

02

Operational reviewer

Confirm authorized inputs and applicable constraints. Review unknowns and limitations without treating the report as permission to change equipment.

Useful findings include refusal and uncertainty

A request may fit the modeled conditions, require a commercially unacceptable revision, or remain unassessable because evidence is missing. Each can inform the next commitment without inventing recovered capacity or uptime improvement.

Compare the synthetic scenarios →

Proof before autonomy

Start with one capacity question.

Agree the decision, evidence boundary, responsibilities, and paid scope before work begins.