Scenario B · REPAIR · v1.0.0
A smaller commitment needs review
The proposed 7.0 MW increment exceeds the fixture’s modeled 5.8 MW increment. A reduced workload profile requires review.
All MW figures are additional load above a steady 20.0 MW reference. Authored UTC window: 2026-09-22T00:00:00Z to 2026-09-22T01:00:00Z.
Synthetic teaching scenario. No customer result or equipment-control authority.
| Nominal increment | 12.0 MW |
|---|---|
| Modeled eligible increment | 5.8 MW |
| Requested workload | 7.0 MW |
| Proposed revised workload | 5.8 MW |
| Operator-accepted / observed delivered | Not applicable / Not applicable |
Requested profile: demo-01-b-requested.
Revised profile: demo-01-b-revised.
Governing conditions
Request exceeds the modeled increment: The proposed revision is 1.2 MW below the request. No minimum commercially viable workload is specified for this fixture.
Boundary, hour, operating reserve, cooling evidence, and workload requirements must be reviewed together.
Business decision still to resolve
Would the reduced 5.8 MW profile still meet the service and commercial requirement?
Economics unestimated. No price, utilization, investment cost, or commercial service requirement has been assessed.
What this does not establish
Physical feasibility, commercial usefulness, customer report acceptance, operational capacity acceptance, and equipment authority require separate evidence and decisions.
Phasing, another time window, cooling investment, and bridge power are unassessed investigation options, not evaluated alternatives.